The Value of Memoir: Who Decides What's "Good"

The value of memoir is often touted as a vital tool for understanding the self and society. Are our memoirs supposed to set good examples? Who decides what's good in this context? Who postulates that a personal story must be sanitized, structured, or safeguarded against the possibility of causing harm or discomfort?

The memoir may not intentionally provide a template for virtue, but will often present a raw, often uncomfortable mirror of human complexity. It captures personal truths and historic moments through intimate, subjective storytelling. But the moment a memoir is released into the world, it comes under scrutiny—not only for its authenticity but for its moral implications.

The Expectation to Inspire

Isn't there this unspoken pressure for memoirs to be these neat, feel-good narratives? Doesn't the way some describe memoir writing make it sound like we're chiseling our profound wisdom into tablets for all to read? Don't publishers seem to gravitate towards those predictable tales of triumph and neatly packaged life lessons? And haven't we, as readers, been subtly trained to expect that takeaway, that glimmer of hope or direction, rather than just the raw, unfiltered account of a life lived? But must every story carry a moral? Can't a narrative simply unfold as it did? Are we, in sharing our experiences, obligated to present ourselves as paragons of virtue?

This expectation stems from a longstanding cultural belief that storytelling is a vehicle for moral instruction. From ancient fables to contemporary self-help books, narratives have been used to teach values. But the value of memoir is not the same as the value of a parable. Memoirs are not neat moral lessons. They are jagged, unresolved, and deeply personal. Insisting they function as role models may actually undermine their most honest impulses.

What Is “Good,” and Who Gets to Say?

When we say someone should “set a good example,” we must ask: who defines what “good” is? The term is slippery, context-bound, and shaped by dominant ideologies. In some cultures, obedience is “good.” In others, rebellion. In some families, silence is virtue; in others, openness is. The moment a memoir challenges these norms—when someone writes candidly about addiction, estrangement, mental illness, or unconventional choices—it risks being cast as a bad example.

But perhaps the deeper concern is this: if someone reads our story and decides to emulate our mistakes, are we responsible? Should we silence or edit the story to prevent that possibility? Must every personal truth be curated to protect others’ interpretations or reactions? Is that what we really mean by the value of memoir?

The Danger of the Flawless Story

There’s a quiet tyranny in the idea that memoirs should uplift or edify. This logic assumes that we must always appear in our best light. That we must always learn the right lesson. That we must, above all, be safe narrators—people who, despite past troubles, now live correctly and can teach others how to do the same.

But flawed stories are not only more honest—they are more human. A memoir that admits to confusion, anger, guilt, or contradiction does more to expand our understanding of life than one that pretends to a polished resolution. And yet, it is precisely these flaws that can make some readers uncomfortable. “What if someone reads this and thinks it’s okay to be like that?” we hear. Or worse: “What if this makes me feel bad about myself?”

But that discomfort may be where the true value of memoir lies.

Memoir as Confrontation, Not Consolation

We do not ask novels or films to always set good examples—why should memoirs be any different? Art is supposed to challenge us, not just comfort us. A memoir is not a motivational speech or a textbook. It is a reckoning. It is a confrontation with the self, and by extension, with the reader.

In reading someone else’s intimate truth, we are forced to confront our own. We may feel jealous, ashamed, angry, or defensive—not because the writer failed to set a good example, but because they dared to say something we have not yet admitted to ourselves. The value of memoir, then, is not in its ability to show us how to be good, but in its power to show us how it feels to be real.

Freedom to Be Unfinished

Another dimension to this issue is the idea that we must have resolved our stories before sharing them. That we must be on the “other side” of trauma, addiction, or identity confusion. But what if we are still in the middle of it? What if we don’t have neat takeaways yet? Are we not allowed to speak?

This pressure to present the final chapter instead of the ongoing process stifles many would-be memoirists. It tells them: your voice only matters if your arc is complete and morally instructive. But real life rarely offers such resolutions. The value of memoir may instead lie in showing life in motion, vulnerability without closure, stories without clear right or wrong.

Toward a Radical Honesty

The real question isn’t whether memoirs should set good examples, but whether we are willing to live with stories that don’t. In a world increasingly obsessed with virtue-signaling and public image, the messy, unresolved, flawed memoir is a radical act. It says: this is who I am, not who I should be. It invites readers not to emulate, but to empathize. Not to judge, but to witness.

We do not sanitize or shrink from the truth but we write and read memoirs that make us uncomfortable, that reveal the full range of human experience. That, perhaps, is the truest value of memoir—not to tell others how to live, but to show that we lived, fully and honestly, without apology.

Subscribe to our newsletter